Showing posts with label material selection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label material selection. Show all posts

Sunday, 3 May 2026

High Performance Thermoplastic Selection - Part 2D: Liquid Crystal Polymers (LCP) and High-performance Polyesters (Polycyclohexylene terephthalate - PCT)

Hello and welcome to Part 2D of my  High Performance Thermoplastics Selection blog series. 

Overview - 6 major high performance thermoplastics families (“the magnificent six”) 

In this blog post series we discuss six major high performance thermoplastics families (“the magnificent six”) which are outlined in the following enumeration

1. Introduction to High Performance Polymers

2. Short profile of the "magnificent six" families:

-Part 2A: Polysulfides (Polyphenylene sulfide - PPS), Polysulfones (PSU, PESU, PPSU), and Polyarylates (PAR)

-Part 2B: Imide-Based Polymers (PEI, PAI, PESI, TPI, PI) and Polybenzimidazoles (PBI, PBI+PEEK, PBI+PEKK)

-Part 2C: Polyether (PPE)

-Part 2C: Polyether (PAEK, PEEK, PEKK)

-Part 2D: Liquid Crystal Polymers (LCP) and High-performance Polyesters (Polycyclohexylene terephthalate - PCT)

-Part 2E: Semi- and Fully Aromatic Polyamides (PARA, PPA, Aramid)

-Part 2F: Polyhalogenolefins (PTFE, PCTFE, FEP, PVDF, ECTFE)

3. Key properties and design data for selection

4. Polymer Material Selection 4-stage funnel methodology (POMS-Funnel-Method)

5. Examples for Ultra- and high performance polymer selection

Let's start with LCP. 

1) Liquid Crystal Polymers (LCP)

1.1 Introduction

Liquid Crystal Polymers (LCPs) are a class of high-performance thermoplastics characterized by their ability to form ordered (liquid crystalline) structures in the melt phase. This molecular alignment leads to exceptional mechanical and thermal properties, even at elevated temperatures.

LCPs are considered super engineering plastics and are widely used in electronics, automotive, and precision components.

Discovery of LCP - Friedrich Reinitzer and Otto Lehmann

In 1888, Friedrich Reinitzer, an Austrian chemist and botanist, observed unusual temperature-dependent behavior in cholesteryl benzoate. He noticed it melted into a hazy liquid at one temperature and then became clear at a higher temperature, exhibiting color changes upon cooling before solidifying. Puzzled by these two melting points, Reinitzer sent his findings and the material to German physicist Otto Lehmann. Lehmann used a heated microscope to further investigate and identified the hazy liquid as a new state of matter with crystalline properties, which he named a "liquid crystal." While this discovery by Reinitzer and Lehmann around the turn of the 20th century generated initial scientific interest and the identification of nearly 200 similar compounds, practical applications were not immediately apparent, leading to a decline in research focus.

1.2 Chemistry and Production

Not to be overlooked is the fact that every LCP has a unique chemical structure. This implies that although the term "liquid crystalline polymer" refers to the overall set of features, each manufacturer of LCP may have unique chemical structures and this is similar to polyamides. For example, PA6 and PA 4.6 show significantly differing thermal resistance, yet they both absorb more water than polyesters and have poorer dimension stability. While each polyamide has a unique chemical structure that determines its different thermal resistance, the amide-bonding group determines the increased water absorption property.

Looking into the literature [1] of polymer chemistry, we can distinguish between

-Type I LCP (HDT a 1.82 MPa > 260°C), 

-Type II LCP (HDT = 210-260°C), and

-Type III (HDT < 210°C). 

All three types contain a p-hydroxybenzoic group and are called  “thermotropic” LCP ( in contract to “lyotropic” LCP = liquid crystals can be seen in solvent as a solution; most well known lyotrpic LCP is based on PARA-Aramid). The crystals stay solid in the melt phase and can be modelled as matchsticks during the injection moulding filling process. Applying shear to the polymer will result in a very good alignment of the matchsticks.

LCPs are typically aromatic polyesters or polyester-amides, which are built from rigid rod-like monomers (e.g., hydroxybenzoic acid, terephthalic acid derivatives).

Polymerization via:

  • Melt polycondensation
  • Occasionally solution polymerization

Key structural feature:

  • Highly anisotropic molecular chains
  • Self-aligning during processing → liquid crystalline phase

Some more history on the commercialization of LCP - Example Xydar

Xydar Liquid Crystal Polymer (LCP) is a high-performance thermoplastic, commercially introduced by Dartco Manufacturing Company in 1984. It is notable as one of the first melt-processable aromatic polyesters, characterized by its ability to form ordered, rigid-rod structures in the melt phase, providing superior high-temperature performance (melting points > 300°C) and chemical resistance.

The technology originated from research in the 1970s, with Dartco (a subsidiary of Dart Industries) obtaining a license for production from Carborundum.

  • Composition: Xydar is a Type I LCP, generally based on a copolymer of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (HBA) and related monomers, designed for high heat distortion temperatures (HDT).
  • Industrialization (1984): Dartco launched Xydar as a commercial product, targeting high-heat applications. In 1985, Dartco licensed Xydar to Nippon Petrochemical, which after establishing the JX Nippon group is since 2021 on the market as Eneos LC. Eneos focus selling LCP in China (80%), Japan and rest of Asia.
  • Amoco Acquisition (1987): At the end of 1987, Amoco Chemical Company acquired the patent rights to Xydar from Dartco.
  • Further Ownership Changes: The product line was later part of Solvay Advanced Polymers and is currently associated with Syensqo (formerly Solvay).

Xydar was part of the first wave of commercial liquid crystal polymers in the mid-1980s (alongside Celanese’s Vectra in 1985). 

History of Kevlar invented by Stephanie Kwolek from Dupont in 1965

In 1965, DuPont chemist Stephanie Kwolek invented Kevlar, a lightweight, high-strength synthetic fiber five times stronger than steel by weight, while researching durable tire materials. Her accidental discovery of a milky, liquid crystalline solution—later spun into fiber—revolutionized materials science and led to widespread use in bullet-resistant vests, protective gear, and aerospace components. 

Initially called "Fiber B," the material was later named Kevlar. It is an aramid fiber (para-phenylenediamine and terephthaloyl chloride) known for extreme strength, stiffness, and heat resistance.

The remarkable strength and energy absorption of Kevlar stem from its dense network of hydrogen bonds between polymer chains and its rigid aromatic rings, which inhibit chain twisting and impart a characteristic rod-like structure. 

Table 1 compares thermotropic LCP to lyotropic LCP. 

Table 1: Comparison of thermotropic LCP vs lyotropic LCP. 

1.3 Properties of LCP

  • Thermal properties: CUT vs. HDT of LCP 

The short term temperature resistance of engineering polymers can be improved by adding glass-fiber reinforcement, however the long term temperature resistance stays on a similar level. This is different with high heat plastics such as PEEK, PPS, LCP, Polyarylates (PAR), Polysulfones (PSU, PESU, PPSU), and Polyimides (PEI, PAI, PI). They combine a high short- and long term thermal resistance. Figure 1 compares the Continuous Use temperature (CUT) to the Heat Deflection Temperature (HDT; short term temperature resistance) of high performance and engineering polymers.  LCP has an excellent short- and long-term temperature stability.

Figure 1: Thermal properties of LCP - comparison of short and long temperature. 

  • Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA):

LCP has a high heat deflection temperature (HDT; e.g. LCP-GF30: 282 °C at 1.8 MPa) and continuous use temperatures (CUT) up to ~200–300°CLCPs do not have a “glass transition” temperature in the classical way of definition (Alpha temperature transition enabling the movement of more than 40 C-atoms in backbone [3]). They have a liquid crystal temperature. Figure 2 shows the DMA curves of PESU (amorphous; Tg = 220°C), PEEK (semi-crystalline; Tg=143°C; Tm =334°C), and LCP (Tlc = 300-380°C). LCP does not have a glass transition temperature, nor a melting temperature. It has a liquid crystalline temperature where the crystals  remain solid, however the linkages between the solid crystals can move [1]. If you examine in detail the literature, a small transition temperature of LCP was found at 120°C. LCP can keep a high mechanical strength level up to 300 °C, outperforming PEEK and PESU. 

Figure 2: Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) of LCP, PEEK, and PESU.

  • Mechanical properties

LCP has a very high stiffness and strength with a self-reinforcing effect and as an example is the relationship of wall thickness and tensile strength of LCP:

The skin layer's thickness of LCP is almost 200 μm and is a result of the strong orientation of the solid crystal elements (“matchsticks”). The ratio of the skin layer to the total thickness increases proportionately as the thickness decreases. The skin layer has strong mechanical properties since it is made up of highly aligned fibrous semi-crystals of stiff rod molecules. Because of this, LCP's strength will progressively rise as its thickness decreases. Figure 3 shows this relationship of a LCP, and comparing it to a PBT and PESU. This is a common and unique feature of LCP that isn't seen in traditional polymers. 

Figure 3: Relationship of wall thickness and tensile strength of LCP.

  • Low creep and excellent fatigue resistance
  • Highly anisotropic properties (direction-dependent)
  • Excellent dimensional stability
  • Thermal conductivity
Figure 4 shows the thermal conductivity of LCP+PTFE, LCP+MF30, LCP+GF30, and LCP+CF30 [9]. The thermal conductivity increases slightly for glass fiber reinforced LCP. 

Figure 4: Thermal conductivity of different filled LCP grades as function of the temperature [9].

  • Electrical: Very low dielectric constant and loss (Figure 5), making LCP ideal for high-frequency (5G, RF) applications.

Figure 5: Dielectric constant of different LCPs [9].

  • Chemical: Excellent chemical resistance
  • Low moisture absorption
  • Unique feature: Self-reinforcing behavior due to molecular orientation. Know how in part design and material selection is needed to unfold the full potential of LCP. 

1.4 Processing Methods

  • Injection molding (primary method)
  • Extrusion (films, fibers)
  • Thin-wall molding capability
  • Very low viscosity in melt → high flowability
  • Key processing aspect: Properties strongly depend on flow direction and orientation

1.5 Applications

  • Electrical & electronics: Connectors, sockets, SMT components, Lead-free reflow soldering of LEDs
  • High-frequency electronics: 5G antennas, RF components
  • Automotive: Sensor housings, ignition components
  • Industrial: Precision gears, micro-components

1.6 Economic Aspects

Higher costs compared to standard engineering plastics

Cost is justified by:

  • Miniaturization capability
  • High performance in demanding environments
  • Often replaces metals or ceramics in niche applications

1.7 Suppliers / Trade Names

Major global thermotropic LCP suppliers include:

  • Celanese – Vectra®, Zenite®
  • Toray – SIVERAS™
  • Sumitomo Chemical - SUMIKASUPER ™ LCP
  • Polyplastics - Laperos®
  • Syensqo - Xydar® 

2) Polycyclohexylene Terephthalate (PCT)

2.1 Introduction

PCT is a high-temperature, semi-crystalline polyester belonging to the engineering thermoplastics family. It is structurally similar to PET and PBT but offers higher thermal resistance and hydrolysis stability.

It is often positioned as a high-performance polyester for electrical and automotive applications.

Discovery of PCT

PCT was developed by Eastman Kodak and introduced in the early 1950s under the trade name KODEL II. While similar in structure to Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET), PCT features a cyclohexylene ring within its structure. This modification gives it a higher melting point (approximately 285°C), and better hydrolysis resistance. In 1980, General Electric Co. commercialized extrusion-grade PCT for use in construction materials and high-strength panels. 

While initial applications were in fibers, PCT gained traction as a specialized injection molding resin due to its superior heat performance and ability to remain dimensionally stable. PCTs have high initial whiteness which can be further modified by additives. This results in high reflective values (>95% @ 460 nm). Therefore, PCTs are good material candidates for LED applications, where high reflectivity, combined with  luminosity retention over the product service life is needed. 

Replacing thermoset Electric and Electronic applications is possible too.

2.2 Chemistry and Production

  • Polymer: Polycyclohexylene dimethylene terephthalate

Produced by polycondensation of:

  • Terephthalic acid (TPA)
  • Cyclohexanedimethanol (CHDM)

Structure:

  • Aromatic + cycloaliphatic backbone

→ Provides:

  • High rigidity
  • Improved thermal resistance vs PET/PBT, excellent chemical resistance, and high crystallinity.

2.3 Properties of PCT

  • Thermal: high-temperature form stability (up to 256°C shortly), high melting point (~285°C), and excellent resistance to reflow soldering (~255°C). Also, good long-term heat resistance.
  • Optical properties: Figure 6 shows the high reflectance values according ASTM E1331 of two Lavanta® HPP grades [10]. 

Figure 6: Optical properties (Reflectance) of Lavanta® High Performance Polyester [10].

  • Mechanical: High stiffness and dimensional stability (PCT-GF15 reach a tensile modulus of 7 GPa with a tensile strength of 70 MPa and 1.2 % tensile strain).
  • Good creep resistance
  • Chemical: Resistant to automotive fluids and cleaning agents.
  • Good hydrolysis resistance (better than PET)
  • Electrical: High dielectric strength and High CTI (comparative tracking index).
  • Moisture behavior: Low water and moisture absorption, resulting in stable properties. (water absorption after 24 hours is typically 0.057 %; ASTM D570)
Figure 7 shows an engineering comparison for typical unfilled, semicrystalline Polyesters which can be used during material selection.

Figure 7: Engineering comparison for typical unfilled, semicrystalline Polyesters (PET, PBT, and PCT) which can be used during material selection.

2.4 Processing Methods

  • Injection molding (main process)
  • Fast cycle times (good flow behavior)

Compatible with:

  • Glass fiber reinforcement (20–30%)
  • Flame-retardant formulations

2.5 Applications

  • Electrical & electronics: Connectors, switches, relays
  • Automotive: Sensor housings, connectors, interior components which require high reflectivity 
  • Lighting: LED reflectors (color stability advantage)
  • Industrial: High-temperature components as well as filaments and fibers (industrial use).

2.6 Economic Aspects

  • More expensive than PET/PBT
  • Less expensive than LCP

Attractive for:

  • High-temperature polyester niche with re-flow soldering
  • Drop-in replacement for PBT in some cases
  • Replacement of thermosets

Short material selection guide

PET: choose when higher strength/stiffness is needed and managing processing in careful way is possible.

PBT: choose when the best molding productivity and a strong all-round property balance is needed.

PCT: choose when thermal margin, hydrolysis resistance, high reflectivity (LEDs) and dimensional stability at high temperature matter most.

2.7 Suppliers / Trade Names

Key suppliers include:

  • Syensqo - Lavanta®
  • Celanese – Thermx®
  • Eastman – Eastar®
  • SK Chemicals – SkyPURA®

LCP and PCT: Key Comparison Insight 

Figure 8 compares LCP and PCT for having a quick overview on the main properties. 

Figure 8: Comparison of LCP and PCT.

Practical selection guidance for LCP and PCT

Choose LCP when:

When very high flow, very thin walls, micro-molding, excellent dimensional accuracy, or high-frequency electrical performance is needed. LCPs are also attractive when self-reinforcing behavior and low CTE are beneficial, and when the design can tolerate or exploit anisotropy.

Choose PCT when:

When a high-temperature polyester with more conventional semi-crystalline behavior, strong chemical resistance, good electrical performance, and compatibility with standard injection molding practice is needed. PCT is especially compelling for electrical and automotive connector applications where solder resistance matters but LCP-level miniaturization is not mandatory.

Final Engineering Takeaway

LCP = highest flow, highest miniaturization potential, anisotropic performance, premium cost → Best for electronics, RF, precision parts

PCT = high-temperature semi-crystalline polyester, balanced connector material, easier substitution path from other engineering polyesters → Best for connectors, automotive, and electrical applications

Check out the other parts of this series too: 

The 11 Functional Groups of Polymers — A Primer for Polymer Engineers

-Part 2A: Polysulfides (Polyphenylene sulfide - PPS), Polysulfones (PSU, PESU, PPSU), and Polyarylates (PAR)

-Part 2B: Imide-Based Polymers (PEI, PAI, PESI, TPI, PI) and Polybenzimidazoles (PBI, PBI+PEEK, PBI+PEKK)

-Part 2C: Polyether (PPE)

-Part 2C: Polyether (PAEK, PEEK, PEKK)

Thanks for reading & #findoutaboutplastics

Greetings, 

Herwig 

Literature: 

[1] https://www.sumitomo-chem.co.jp/sep/english/products/pdf/lcp_users_manual_v31_e.pdf

[2] https://www.findoutaboutplastics.com/2026/01/high-performance-thermoplastic.html

[3] https://youtube.com/shorts/OIwTTClNroE

[4] https://www.findoutaboutplastics.com/2024/03/high-heat-plastics-selection-liquid.html

[5] https://www.findoutaboutplastics.com/2018/12/dynamic-mechanical-analysis-dma-as.html

[6] https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=13872

[7] https://www.ptonline.com/articles/tracing-the-history-of-polymeric-materials-part-27-lcp

[8] Zeus- Introduction to LCP 

[9] https://www.celanese.com/products/lcp-vectra-zenite

[10] https://www.syensqo.com/en/brands/lavanta-hpp/properties

[11] https://www.polymermaterialselection.com

[12] https://www.justerexpertwitness.com

[13] https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/the-life-and-achievements-of-chemist-stephanie-kwolek-inventor-of-kevlar

Influence of fillers on the efficiency of Antioxidants in Polypropylene (PP)

Hello and welcome to a new blog post in which we discuss the influence of fillers on the efficiency of Antioxidans additives in Polypropylene (PP). 

Fillers and Antioxidant Efficiency in Polypropylene

The Figure 1 highlights an important point about the long-term thermo-oxidative stability of polypropylene (PP): not all fillers are neutral in their effect on ageing performance. 

Under oven ageing at 160°C, the results show a clear reduction in time to embrittlement for PP filled with talc and calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) compared with unfilled PP. 

In other words, both fillers have a negative impact on long-term stability under these conditions, with talc showing the strongest reduction. The figure is a useful reminder that filler selection must be considered not only from a cost and stiffness perspective, but also from the standpoint of antioxidant efficiency and durability.


A note on testing for plastics embrittlement

The standards ASTM D5510 (Standard Practice for Heat Aging of Oxidatively Degradable Plastics) and ASTM D3045 (Standard Practice for Heat Aging of Plastics Without Load) were used with regular tensile testing during oven aging (ISO 527 / ASTM D882). Focus is not so much on tensile strength, but more on Elongation-at-break which is the most direct indicator of embrittlement. 

A sharp drop (often to <50% of its original value) indicates the PP has become brittle. A brittle PP might maintain its tensile strength, it will snap almost immediately when bent or stretched. 

Check out my other posts on additives here:

The Important Role of Additives: Enhancing Polymer Properties for High Performance Applications (Part 1)

Thanks for reading & #findoutaboutplastics!

Greetings, 

Herwig 

Literature: 

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/posts/herwigjuster_findoutaboutplastics-share-7454851060814348289-PnnQ?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAABCkmMcBev71cuhh4-jzEaiPHFO5VFb4aO0

[2] M. Bonnet - Kunststoffe in der Ingenieuranwendung

Wednesday, 1 April 2026

The 11 Functional Groups of Polymers — A Primer for Polymer Engineers

Hello and welcome to this new blog post in which we discuss the functional groups of polymers. 

Introduction — why functional groups matter

Figure 1: Overview of the functional groups of polymers. 

Functional groups are the recurring atom clusters in organic molecules whose chemistry largely determines material properties (polarity, hydrogen-bonding, thermal stability, chemical resistance, chain rigidity, degradability, etc.). 

In polymers, the functional group(s) present in the backbone or pendant positions control bulk properties and processing behaviour, so identifying the dominant functional group is a quick route to predicting performance during material selection

What are the 11 functional groups we will discuss in this post:

  • Imide group
  • Sulfone Group
  • Amide Group
  • Ester Group
  • Ketone Group
  • Sulfide Group
  • Ether Group
  • Arene Group
  • Alcohol Group
  • Alkane Group
  • Haloalkane Group
Let us get starting!

1) Imide group — structure: –CO–N–CO– (cyclic or linear imide)
Figure 1: Functional groups of polymers: Imide group.

What it gives: outstanding high-temperature stability, good chemical resistance, high glass transition (rigid backbone), low creep.
Typical polymers / examples: Polyimides (e.g., Kapton®, Vespel®) used for high-T films, electrical insulation, aerospace parts. Polyimides are classic high-performance plastics made from dianhydride + diamine routes. 
Notes: Alkyl groups (R-) are saturated, non-aromatic hydrocarbon chains derived from alkanes (e.g., methyl, ethyl).
Aryl groups (Ar-) are aromatic rings derived from compounds like benzene.

2) Sulfone group — structure: –SO2– (often between aryl groups)
Figure 2: Functional groups of polymers: Sulfone group.

What it gives: high thermal stability, hydrolytic stability, rigidity and flame resistance; good dimensional stability and toughness in amorphous engineering resins.
Typical polymers / examples: Polysulfones / Polyethersulfones / Polyphenylsulfone (PSU, PES/PESU, PPSU — trade names include Ultrason®, Radel®). Widely used in medical devices, plumbing/valves, electrical components and under-the-bonnet automotive parts. 

3) Amide group — structure: –CONH–
Figure 3: Functional groups of polymers: Amide group.

What it gives: strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding resulting in high strength and toughness, relatively high melting point, moisture uptake (hydrophilicity increases with amide density), good abrasion resistance.
Typical polymers / examples: Polyamides (Nylons) — PA6, PA66, PA11, PA12; Semi-aromatic polyamides such as PPA, and fully-aromatic polyamides (aramids) such as Kevlar® for ballistic & high-strength uses. Use in fibers, gears, bearings, structural components. 

4) Ester group — structure: –COO– (ester linkage in backbone)
Figure 4: Functional groups of polymers: Ester group.

What it gives: backbone polarity (good mechanical strength), susceptibility to hydrolysis (hence biodegradability for some), good melt processability (thermoplastic polyesters).
Typical polymers / examples: Polyesters — PET (polyethylene terephthalate), PBT, PLA (polylactide). Used for fibers, bottles, films, engineering thermoplastics and (for some aliphatic esters) biodegradable medical devices. 
Example: Carbonate functional group
If the organic rest "R1" is replaced by a oxygen,  R-O-C(=O)-O-R2, we obtain a carbonate ester, which are utilized in the creation of polycarbonate (PC). 

5) Ketone group — structure: –CO– (ketone carbonyl in backbone or adjacent to aromatic units)
Figure 5: Functional groups of polymers: Ketone group.

What it gives: increased backbone polarity and stiffness; when combined with ether linkages in high-performance families it confers elevated Tg and chemical resistance.
Typical polymers / examples: Poly(aryl ether ketone) family (PAEK) — includes PEEK, PEK, PEKK — used for high-temperature structural parts, bearings, medical implants, and additive manufacturing in demanding applications. PAEKs combine aryl, ether and ketone functionalities giving excellent thermo-oxidative stability. 

6) Sulfide group — structure: –S– (or disulfide –S–S– / polysulfide –Sx–)
Figure 6: Functional groups of polymers: Sulfide group.


What it gives: enhanced temperature resistance, chemical and solvent resistance; excellent flow for injection molding; inherent flame retardant properties; excellent dimensional stability; 
Typical polymers / examples: Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) trade names include Ryton®, Fortron®.

7) Ether group — structure: –O– (alkyl or aryl ether linkages)
Figure 7: Functional groups of polymers: Ether group.

What it gives: flexibility (aliphatic ethers), good low-temperature toughness, and for aromatic ether linkages (polyarylethers) increased thermal stability and oxidative resistance. Ethers reduce crystallinity when in backbone and improve chain mobility.
Typical polymers / examples: Polyethers (polyethylene glycol PEG/PEO; polypropylene oxide PPO), polyetherimide (PEI), polyethersulfone (PES), epoxy networks (contain ether linkages after cure). Applications span elastomers, polyurethanes (polyether polyols), and engineering plastics. Trade names include Noryl® PPE, Ultem® PEI, Veradel® PESU.

8) Arene (aromatic ring) group — structure: –Ar– (phenyl, substituted phenyl rings in backbone or pendant)
Figure 8: Functional groups of polymers: Arene group.

What it gives: backbone rigidity (high modulus), thermal stability, UV interaction (often poor UV resistance unless stabilized), pi-stacking that influences mechanical and barrier properties. Aromatic content generally increases glass transition and heat resistance.
Typical polymers / examples: Polystyrene (PS) — aromatic pendant phenyls on a saturated backbone; poly(phenylene), polyaryls and many high-performance polymers with aromatic repeat units (e.g., polyimides, PAEK family). Polystyrene is a major commodity aromatic polymer used for foams, rigid packaging and consumer products. 

9) Alcohol (hydroxyl) group — structure: –OH (pendant or chain-end hydroxyls)
Figure 9: Functional groups of polymers: Alcohol group.

What it gives: hydrogen bonding, polarity, water solubility (if dense), reactivity for crosslinking (e.g., with isocyanates to form polyurethanes) or functional modification. Hydroxyls raise surface energy and adhesion.
Typical polymers / examples: Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, PVOH) — water-soluble, used in films, adhesives and hydrogels; alcohol endgroups in polyols (polyether or polyester polyols) are core building blocks for polyurethanes. 

10) Alkane group (saturated hydrocarbon backbone) — structure: –CH2–CH2– etc. (non-functional hydrocarbon chain)
Figure 10: Functional groups of polymers: Alkane group.

What it gives: low polarity results in low surface energy, excellent chemical resistance to polar solvents, high flexibility (especially in low Tg aliphatic polyolefins), good electrical insulating properties and very high production volumes (commodity plastics).
Typical polymers / examples: Polyethylene (PE), Polypropylene (PP). These are the polyolefin family used for films, containers, piping, and fibers. Expect low density, good toughness, and simple processing. 

11) Haloalkane group (alkyl halide pendant or backbone) — structure: –C–X (X = Cl, Br, F)
Figure 11: Functional groups of polymers: Haloalkane group.

What it gives: increased flame retardance (e.g., chlorinated polymers), increased polarity and density, and ready sites for nucleophilic substitution or further modification; halogens can also raise refractive index and change dielectric properties.
Typical polymers / examples: Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) — chlorine on backbone carbons; fluoropolymers (e.g., PTFE — where fluorine dominates) are extreme cases with outstanding chemical resistance and low friction. PVC is used in construction, pipes, cable insulation and flooring; fluoropolymers are used where chemical inertness and high T performance are needed. 

Mixed-functionality polymers & location of the group
  • Backbone vs pendant vs endgroup: a functional group in the backbone (repeat unit) typically dominates bulk mechanical/thermal behaviour. Pendant groups (e.g., the phenyl in polystyrene or the chloro in PVC) tune Tg, polarity and solubility. Endgroups mainly affect surface chemistry and reactivity. 
  • Combinations are common: many engineering polymers combine functional groups (for example, PAEKs include arene, ether and ketone motifs; polysulfones include aryl, ether and sulfone units), which gives the unique combined property sets. 
Overview of all the 11 functional groups of polymers

Figure 12: Overview of the functional groups of polymers.

Check out my video on functional groups too: 


Tuesday, 10 February 2026

Plastics and Polymers Selection for Humanoid Robot Applications: From Structural Skeletons to Artificial Muscles



Hello and welcome to a new material selection post in which we discuss suitable plastics for humanoid robotic applications. It is a longer post and I have structured it into five chapters: 

  • Chapter 1: The Humanoid Market – From Industrial Tools to Bio-mimicry
  • Chapter 2: The Structural Skeleton – PEEK and Reinforced Composites
  • Chapter 3: The “Artificial Muscle” – Electroactive Polymers (EAPs)
  • Chapter 4: Actuation and Tribology – Gears, Wear, and Sealing
  • Chapter 5: The PFAS Challenge – Engineering Without “Forever Chemicals”

Introduction

Humanoid robots represent one of the most demanding convergence points of mechanical engineering, electronics, materials science, and biology-inspired design. Unlike traditional industrial robots, humanoids must be lightweight, energy-efficient, safe for human interaction, and capable of complex, biomimetic motion.

In this context, optimal polymer selection is a key engineering decision. The correct choice of plastic materials is essential to:

  • Ensure reliable function of all robot subsystems

  • Balance stiffness, weight, wear resistance, and durability

  • Prevent premature part failure due to fatigue, creep, wear, or environmental exposure

Poor material selection can lead to unexpected breakdowns, excessive wear, thermal deformation, or regulatory non-compliance, often only discovered late in development or during field operation.

Polymers and polymer-based composites are no longer auxiliary materials in this space — they are enablers. This article explores how advanced plastics underpin modern humanoid robot design, from structural frames to artificial muscles, while addressing emerging regulatory and sustainability challenges.


Chapter 1: The Humanoid Market – From Industrial Tools to Bio-mimicry

Market Context: From Cobots to Autonomous Humanoids

Early collaborative robots (“cobots”) were essentially industrial manipulators made safer through sensors and control algorithms. Their material choices reflected this heritage: steel, aluminum, and classical engineering plastics.

Today’s humanoid robots represent a paradigm shift:

  • Designed for unstructured environments

  • Expected to interact safely with humans

  • Required to move with human-like kinematics

  • Increasingly autonomous, powered by onboard batteries

This shift has forced engineers to rethink mass distribution, inertia, and energy efficiency — areas where polymers outperform metals.

Design Step: Lightweighting as a System-Level Strategy

In humanoid robots, weight is not neutral:

  • Every gram saved in the frame can be reassigned to:

    • Battery capacity (longer runtime)

    • Sensors and AI hardware

    • Payload capability

Polymers enable functional integration (snap-fits, ribs, channels, cable guides) that would require multiple machined metal parts, thereby reducing both part count and mass.


Chapter 2: The Structural Skeleton – PEEK and Reinforced Composites

Material Focus: High-Performance Structural Polymers

The “skeleton” of a humanoid robot must provide high stiffness, fatigue resistance, and dimensional stability under cyclic loads.

Key materials include:

  • PEEK (Polyetheretherketone)

    • Carbon- or glass-fiber reinforced

    • Exceptional stiffness-to-weight ratio (interesting for metal replacement)

    • High thermal stability and chemical resistance

    • Structural frames, gears, joints, bushings, insulation

  • PA 6.6 (Polyamide 6.6)

    • Tough, cost-effective

    • Suitable for secondary load-bearing structures, housings, covers

    • 3D printing possible (SLS)

    • PolyArylAmide (PARA, PA-MXD6): for appliactions in robotics where low moisture, high dimensional stability (enabling complex parts), excellent surface appearance (“best-in-class” among the Polyamides), and outstanding stiffened and strength is needed.

  • Polycarbonate (PC)
    • Impact-resistant, transparent, stable
    • Sensor/camera covers, shields, panels
  • PPS (Polyphenylene Sulfide)

    • Glass-fiber reinforced

    • Excellent dimensional stability

    • High thermal and creep resistance

    • Connectors, housings, parts near heat sources

  • PEI (Polyetherimide)
    • High strength, flame retardant, heat resistant, good electrical properties
    • Connector housings, structural frames
    • Strong, safe, reliable in harsh environments
  • LFT (Long Fiber Thermoplastics)

    • Continuous or long glass/carbon fibers

    • Ideal for large, injection-molded structural parts

    • High load capacity, reduces robot weight

  • High density plastics: 
    • can be used as counter weights / balancing weights
    • locally integrated in plastic part where it is needed via 2-component injection molding

Design Example: Replacing Aluminum with CNC-machined or 3D-printed PEEK

CNC-machined or 3D-printed carbon-filled PEEK can achieve:

  • Elastic modulus approaching aluminum

  • Up to 50% weight reduction

  • Significantly lower rotational inertia

Lower inertia directly translates into:

  • Faster acceleration and deceleration

  • Reduced motor size

  • Lower energy consumption

Additive manufacturing further enables topology-optimized structures, closely mimicking biological bones with hollow cores and load-aligned fiber orientations.


Chapter 3: The “Artificial Muscle” – Electroactive Polymers (EAPs)

Defining EAPs

Electroactive Polymers (EAPs) are materials that change shape, size, or mechanical properties when subjected to an electrical stimulus. They are often described as “muscle-like” materials because their actuation principles resemble biological muscle contraction.

Electronic vs. Ionic EAPs

Electronic EAPs

Examples:

  • Dielectric Elastomers (DEAs)

  • Electrostrictive Graft Elastomers

  • Ferroelectric Polymers

Characteristics:

  • Fast response times

  • High energy density

  • Require high operating voltages

  • Suitable for dry environments

Ionic EAPs

Examples:

  • Ionic Polymer-Metal Composites (IPMCs)

  • Conducting Polymers

  • Carbon Nanotube (CNT) networks

Characteristics:

  • Operate at low voltages

  • Slower response

  • Often require moisture or electrolytes

  • Ideal for fine, low-force movements


Design Example: Eliminating Gears and Motors

EAPs enable soft robotics, where motion is achieved without:

  • Gearboxes

  • Bearings

  • Lubricants

Applications include:

  • Facial expression systems

  • Dexterous fingers

  • Artificial skin and haptics

The result is silent, compliant, and lifelike motion, impossible to achieve with rigid electromechanical systems alone.


Chapter 4: Actuation and Tribology – Gears, Wear, and Sealing

Motion Control: Tribological Plastics

Despite advances in soft actuation, many humanoid joints still rely on conventional rotary actuation. Here, tribological performance is critical.

Key materials:

  • POM (Acetal) – low friction, dimensional stability

  • PA 4.6 – high melting point, excellent fatigue resistance

  • PA 6.10 – outstanding wear resistance

  • Polyketone & PEEK – good wear resistance: Polyketone, as an example,  has a 14 times higher anti-abrasion property compared to POM, allowing for almost permanent use without change.

  • Self-lubricating materials using fillers such as Graphite, Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS2), Carbon fiber, and PTFE/UHMWPE – maintenance-free bearings and joints

These materials allow:

  • Dry-running systems

  • Reduced maintenance

  • Long service life under oscillating motion

Sealing: Protecting Sensitive Electronics

Humanoid robots operate in dusty, humid, and unpredictable environments. Advanced sealing systems are essential.

  • IPSR (Ingress Protection Seals) / PSS (Precision sealing systems)

  • Advanced EPDMNBR and FKM elastomers

  • High-temperature thermoplastics such as Quantix® ULTRA (1.200 °C)

These seals protect:

  • Motors

  • Sensors

  • Control electronics
    …without adding excessive friction or bulk.


Chapter 5: The PFAS Challenge – Engineering Without “Forever Chemicals”

The Regulatory Hurdle

Historically, many high-performance plastics relied on PTFE additives to reduce friction and wear. However:

  • PTFE belongs to the PFAS ( Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) containing family

  • Increasingly restricted under REACH / ECHA and EU 2019/1021

  • Long-term environmental persistence (“forever chemicals”)

This has forced a fundamental rethink of tribological design.

The Innovation Step: Molecular Engineering

Instead of relying on fluorinated additives, modern polymers achieve performance through intrinsic molecular structure.

A prime example:

  • PA4.6

    • Higher melting point than PA 6 or PA 6.6

    • Superior crystallinity (80%)

    • Excellent fatigue and wear resistance

    • Performs under high speed and load without PTFE

This enables PFAS-free gears and bearings suitable for humanoid robot actuators.

Apart from PA 4.6, there are polymers which are inherently wear-resistant too: 

-Polyketone (PK)

-Polyoxymethylene (POM): crystallinity level above 90% possible

-Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE)

-Polyamide-Imide (PAI)

-Polybenzimidazole (PBI)

-Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)

As alternative, Hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) which can offer a fluorine- and micro plastic-free replacement. The very good lubricating properties of hBN come from its crystal structure. We discussed this in detail with Michaela Schopp - Product Manager at Henze BNP AG in this guest interview here.

Conclusion

The selection of high-performance plastics in humanoid robotics is driven by the need for lightweight, durable, and reliable components that can withstand mechanical stress, environmental exposure, and regulatory requirements. Materials like PEEK, PA, PC, POM, PPS, PEI, PU, and LFT each offer unique advantages for specific robot parts, from structural frames to gears and sensor housings (Figure 1). As the robotics industry evolves, the role of advanced, sustainable polymers will only increase, enabling the next generation of agile, efficient, and compliant humanoid robots.

Figure 1: Summary of materials used for Humanoid Robotic applications.

If you need selection support, or a deeper dive into a specific material or application, please let me know!

Thanks for reading & #findoutaboutplastics

Greetings,

Herwig Juster

Literature: 

[1] https://www.fst.com/de/news-stories/pressemitteilungen/2024/thermoplaste-fuer-bis-zu-1200-grad-celsius/

[2] https://www.fst.com/markets/robotics/6-axis-robot/

[3] https://toolbox.igus.com/motion-plastics-blog/understanding-the-humanoid-robot-market/?pk_vid=1727719344ad05051727719347ad0505
[4] https://toolbox.igus.com/motion-plastics-blog/maximizing-humanoid-robot-longevity/?pk_vid=1727719906ad0505
[5] https://www.peekchina.com/blog/plastics-for-humanoid-robots.html
[6] https://www.lft-g.com/blog/peek-the-ultimate-lightweight-material-for-humanoid-robots_b210
[7] https://www.fst.com/news-stories/robotics/humanoid-robots/
[8] https://www.honyplastic.com/news/eight-major-polymer-materials-used-in-humanoid-robots-309468.html
[9] https://www.therobotreport.com/envalior-offers-pfas-free-materials-wear-friction-applications/
[10] https://www.protolabs.com/en-gb/resources/blog/materials-that-command-the-robotics-industry/
[11] https://www.zhongyanpeek.com/peek-composite-materials-reshape-the-future-of-industry-and-humanoid-robots.html
[12] https://schunk.com/de/de/news/schunk-gruendet-tech-spin-off-fuer-humanoide-roboterhaende/36224
[13] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/syensqos-ketaspire-peek-enables-durability-flexible-joints-baleno-5oj9c/?trackingId=DBuQvo0eWn86WUTpTpAECQ%3D%3D
[14] https://www.dreyplas.com/en/polyketone/

Monday, 5 January 2026

High Performance Thermoplastic Selection - Polyether (PPE, PAEK, PEEK, PEKK) [Part 2C - cont.]

Hello and welcome to the Part 2C of our High Performance Thermoplastics selection blog series. Today we discuss the Ether-Ketone Polymer family (PAEK and PEEK), their chemistry and production processes, their main properties, processing methods, and applications.

Overview - 6 major high performance thermoplastics families (“the magnificent six”) 

In this blog post series we discuss six major high performance thermoplastics families (“the magnificent six”) which are outlined in the following enumeration

1. Introduction to High Performance Polymers

2. Short profile of the "magnificent six" families:

-Part 2A: Polysulfides (Polyphenylene sulfide - PPS), Polysulfones (PSU, PESU, PPSU), and Polyarylates (PAR)

-Part 2B: Imide-Based Polymers (PEI, PAI, PESI, TPI, PI) and Polybenzimidazoles (PBI, PBI+PEEK, PBI+PEKK)

-Part 2C: Polyether (PPE, PAEK, PEEK, PEKK)

-Part 2D: Liquid Crystal Polymers (LCP) and High-performance Polyesters (Polycyclohexylene terephthalate - PCT)

-Part 2E: Semi- and Fully Aromatic Polyamides (PARA, PPA, Aramid)

-Part 2F: Polyhalogenolefins (PTFE, PCTFE, FEP, PVDF, ECTFE)

3. Key properties and design data for selection

4. Polymer Material Selection 4-stage funnel methodology (POMS-Funnel-Method)

5. Examples for Ultra- and high performance polymer selection

1. Introduction to Polyaryletherketones

Screening the patent literate regarding the invention of Polyaryletherketones, it was reported independently by Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI) and DuPont. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) was first produced in 1978 by scientists at ICI in the UK, with the first batch made on November 19, 1978, by John B. Rose and Philip A. Staniland's team. ICI commercialized it as Victrex PEEK in the early 1980s, initially for demanding defense and aerospace uses, becoming a high-performance thermoplastic known for its strength, temperature resistance, and chemical inertness. 

In general, the aromatic ether ketone polymer family, including Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), Polyaryletherketone (PAEK), and Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) are high-performance thermoplastics valued for their outstanding mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties. Recent research and industry trends are increasingly focusing on PAEK blends to further tailor and enhance performance for demanding applications.

2. Chemistry and Production

  • Chemical Structure:
    All three are aromatic polyketones with ether and ketone groups.

    • PEEK: Regular ether/ketone sequence.
    • PAEK: Family with variable ether/ketone ratios, allowing for property tuning.
    • PEKK: Higher ketone content, affecting crystallinity and processing.
  • PEEK Polycondensation Process:

    • Mechanism: PEEK is produced via a high-temperature polycondensation reaction, typically through nucleophilic aromatic substitution.
    • Monomers: The main industrial method (patented by Victrex PLC in the late 1970s) uses 4,4'-difluorobenzophenone (or 4,4'-dichlorobenzophenone) and hydroquinone (1,4-benzenediol or bisphenol).
    • Solvent & Catalysts: The reaction occurs in a high-boiling polar aprotic solvent, diphenyl sulfone (DPS), with a mixture of potassium and sodium carbonate as the base.
    • Process Steps:
      • Salt Formation: Hydroquinone reacts with alkali metal carbonates to form a bisphenate salt, releasing water and CO₂.
      • Polycondensation: The bisphenate salt reacts with 4,4'-difluorobenzophenone, displacing fluorine atoms and forming ether linkages, with potassium and sodium fluoride as byproducts.
      • Purification: The resulting high-molecular-weight PEEK powder is cooled, crushed, and washed with hot water and organic solvents (e.g., acetone) to remove residual salts and solvent.
      • Drying: The purified polymer is dried, often under vacuum at ~120°C.
  • PAEK Blends:

    • Produced by blending PAEK with other polymers or additives to achieve specific property profiles, such as improved toughness, flexibility, or processability.
3. Properties

The ether/ketone ratio impacts the thermal transitions of ether-ketone polymers. Table 1 illustrates the influence of the ether/ketone ratio on the thermal transitions of various Polyaryletherketones. As the ether/ketone ratio increases from 1.0 to 3.0, both the glass transition temperature (Tg) and the melting temperature (Tm) of the polymers decrease. Specifically, PEK (ether/ketone ratio 1.0) exhibits the highest Tg and Tm, while PEEEK (ratio 3.0) shows the lowest values. This trend demonstrates that increasing the ether content in the polymer backbone reduces the thermal transitions of Polyaryletherketones by enhancing chain flexibility and increasing the free volume between polymer chains.

For anyone working with high-performance materials, understanding these trends is key to selecting the optimal polymer for demanding applications. 

Table 1: Aromatic Ether-Ketone Polymers - influence of the ether/ketone ration on thermal transitions.

  • PEEK has high thermal stability (max. continuous use temperature UL746B = 260°C; max short-term use temperature: 310°C;  HDT 1.8 MPa = 160°C; melting temperature = 340°C), mechanical strength (tensile modulus = 4000 MPa; tensile strength = 110 MPa), inherent flame retardant (UL94 V0), and high chemical resistance.
  • By adding 30wt% glass fibers, the short term temperature performance of PEEK can be improved from HDT 1.8 MPa = 160°C to HDT 1.8 MPa = 230°C.
  • Blends:
    • Blending ketone-polymers with other polymers (e.g., polyetherimide, polyphenylene sulfide, liquid crystal polymers, or elastomers) can improve processability, impact strength, and tailor crystallinity.
    • Nanofiller or fiber-reinforced PAEK blends offer enhanced mechanical, thermal, and tribological properties.
  • PEKK has a slower crystallization rate which makes it good for 3D printing.
4. Processing Methods
  • Injection Molding, Extrusion, Compression Molding, Machining, 3D Printing.
  • PAEK Blends:
    • Improved processability and lower processing temperatures compared to pure PAEK.
    • Blends can be tailored for compatibility with specific manufacturing techniques.
  • Recycling of PEEK: Regrind of spure, gates and faulty parts can be used without problem up to a level of 25%. Important is to blend the regrind with virgin PEEK pellets to ensure uniform processing and use consistent amount of regrind. 
5. Applications
  • Aerospace: PEEK was originally developed for the aerospace industry. Its high strength-to-weight ratio, flame retardancy (meeting FST standards), and resistance to aerospace fluids like jet fuel are highly valued for improving fuel efficiency and safety: 
    • Structural components: Lightweight brackets, clamps, and clips can replace heavier aluminum parts without compromising strength.
    • Engine components: Seals, bearings, and insulation in turbine systems that withstand high temperatures and pressures.
    • Interior components: Used in seat frames and cabin panels due to its flame-retardant properties and durability.
    • Electrical insulation: Cable insulation and various electrical connectors due to its high dielectric strength. 
  • Automotive: 
    • Engine & Transmission: Thrust washers, seal rings, bushings, and gears in transmission and engine systems, where they endure high temperatures and mechanical stress.
    • Braking Systems: Components in ABS/ESC brake systems and brake wear sensors.
    • Fuel Systems: Seals, O-rings, and valve seats in fuel injection systems and pumps, due to resistance to various fuels and oils.
    • Traction motors: magnet wire coating by using direct extrusion on copper wire. 
  • Electronics
  • Medical: Surgical equipment and long-term implantable devices, because of its biocompatibility, radiolucency (transparent to X-rays), and ability to withstand repeated sterilization. Applications include handles for reusable surgical instruments, sterilization trays, and components in fluid transfer systems and pumps (e.g., in dialysis equipment). 
  • Oil & Gas: In the demanding high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) and corrosive environments of the oil and gas industry, PEEK's resistance to hydrocarbons, steam, and aggressive chemicals is crucial. Applications include sealing systems, downhole tools, Valve and Pump Components.
  • 3D Printing.
  • PAEK Blends:
    • Used where a balance of toughness, chemical resistance, and processability is required.
    • Fiber- or nanoparticle-reinforced blends are ideal for lightweight, high-strength parts in aerospace and automotive sectors.
6. Economic Aspects
  • Cost:
    High compared to engineering and other high-performance polymers, however blends can sometimes reduce costs by enabling easier processing or using less expensive co-polymers.
  • Value:
    Blends offer tailored solutions, potentially reducing total cost of ownership through improved performance and manufacturability.
7. Suppliers
  • PEEK: Victrex (VICTREX 450G™), Syensqo (KetaSpire®), Evonik (VESTAKEEP®),  Zhejiang Pfluon Chemical (PFLUON®), Zhongyan Polymer Materials Co (ZYPEEK).
  • PAEK: Victrex (LMPAEK™), Syensqo (AvaSpire® PAEK).
  • PEKK: Arkema (Kepstan®), Syensqo (APC and Cypek).
  • Ether/Ketone Blends: Offered by major suppliers and custom compounders; specific formulations may be proprietary.

Key Takeaway:
Ether ketone polymers represent a versatile and growing area in high-performance polymers, enabling engineers to fine-tune properties for specific application needs—especially where a balance of toughness, processability, and chemical resistance is critical.

In the next part, we will discuss Liquid Crystal Polymers (LCP) and High-performance Polyesters (Polycyclohexylene terephthalate - PCT).

Literature: 

[1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10575340/#polymers-15-03943-f004

[2] https://www.vink-kunststoffe.de/produkte/peek/technisches-datenblatt-peek.pdf

[3] https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-011-7073-4_18

[4] https://www.syensqo.com/en/brands/ketaspire-peek

[5] https://www.victrex.com/en/products/polymers/peek-polymers

[6] https://www.findoutaboutplastics.com/2020/11/plastic-part-failure-part-2-antidote.html