Friday, 24 March 2017

My Top 5 Commodity Plastics for Medical Device Applications – Part 2: PE


Welcome back to this blog series about my top 5 commodity plastics used for medical device applications.

Here the link to part 1 - PVC.

Let’s jump right to it:

Nr. 2 – Polyethylene (PE)

The second polymer of this commodity series is Polyethylene (PE).

PE is available in 4 different forms:

  • Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE): constituted of long-chain polymer branches which prevent packing (crystallization) leading to a low density material.
  • Linear Low Density Polyethylene (LLDPE): contains 10 to 35 low molecular weight (MW) side chains per 1000 carbon atoms constituting a main polymer chain. This allows intermediate packing.
  • High Density Polyethylene (HDPE): contains 4 to 10 low MW side chains per 1000 carbon atoms of a main polymer chain. This leads to excellent packing.
  • Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE): it is a linear very high MW PE with lowest amount of short chains. This leads to superior strength and stiffness.

A comparison of properties, advantages and disadvantages is shown in the Table 1 [1].

Table 1: Comparison between the different PE grades.
How does PE perform in terms of sterilization?
EtO sterilization is usually suitable for PE [1]. Steam and autoclave sterilization are not an option due the low heat deflection temperatures (30-50°C) of PE. High-energy radiation sterilization methods such as gamma radiation and e-beam maybe used on stabilized PE (using radiation sterilization on non-stabilized PE will lead to oxidation and cross-linking). In case PE contains phosphite-based stabilizers yellowing may occur upon sterilization.

What about biocompatibility?
In general, polyolefins are inert, non-polar and possess biocompatibility. Surface oxidation during radiation sterilization procedures lead to a reduction of PE’s biocompatibility. Consequently, radiation sterilization must be performed under inert atmosphere. Furthermore, the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel concluded in their safety assessment of PE that this is non-toxic and shows no threat when used in cosmetics and medical applications [2].
Where is PE used in medical device applications?
Starting with LDPE, it has good flexibility, strength, and barrier properties at low costs. Furthermore, it has high clarity together with good tear and stress crack resistance. For example, it finds application in sterile blister packs for drugs. LLDPE has a superior flexibility and toughness and is, therefore, used for films and packaging. HDPE has a much higher crystallinity, improved chemical resistance and stiffness compared to LDPE and LLDPE. As a result, it is used in surgical and medical instruments. In addition, its high energy absorption, considerable impact strength and low wear makes it the ideal candidate for artificial hip, knee and shoulder joint replacement implants. LDPE, LLDPE and HDPE are also used in flexible tubing, where they strongly compete with PVC. UHMWPE is mostly used in arthroplasty implants. Herein, vitamin E is a key additive that improves wear and long term stability of UHMWPE [3]. In Table 2, below, you can find further details regarding the application of PE in healthcare.
Table 2: Examples for PE based medical device applications.
Where to get PE for your medical device applications?
HC grade certified thermoplastics suppliers of PE [1]:



[1] Vinny R. Sastri: Plastics in Medical Devices, 2014
[2] Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel. Int J Toxicol 2007
[3] Wolf, C.; Krivec, T.; Lederer, K.; Schneider, W. Examination of the suitability of alpha-tocopherol as a stabilizer for ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene used for articulating surfaces in joint endoprostheses. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2002, 13, 185–189.













Thursday, 23 March 2017

My Top 5 Commodity Plastics for Medical Device Applications – Part 1: PVC



In this blog post series I will present to you my top 5 commodity plastics for medical device applications.

Just before we start, we should answer the following question: why are plastics so successful in healthcare applications nowadays?

I think there are easily over 20 reasons why the use of plastics is absolutely beneficial. Just to name the most important ones:
  • A wide range of tailor-made materials is possible.
  • Plastics processing technologies allow great freedom when designing parts.
  • It is possible to produce micro component parts as well.
  • Plastic parts allow the assembling of light weight structures.
  • Part’s transparency and impact resistance are simultaneously possible.
  • Chemical resistance including lipids resistance is possible.
  • Mass production can be easily accomplished enabling economies of scale.


Plastic materials are commonly divided into 3 major categories, i.e., commodity plastics, engineering thermoplastics and high performance plastics.

We will start from the bottom with the commodities. In terms of use, 70% of the medical device applications use commodity plastics [1]. In my opinion the following are the most important ones:
  1. Polyvinylchloride (PVC)
  2. Polyethylene (PE)
  3. Polypropylene (PP)
  4. Cycloolefincopolymers (COC)
  5. Polystyrene (PS)
In this blog series, I will discuss each of these 5 materials in terms of medical device related design questions, sterilization capability and biocompatibility. In addition, I will show application examples as well as material suppliers.


Nr. 1 – Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)
PVC-based materials are usually characterized by their K and Shore hardness values [2].
A common K-value for PVC is between 50 and 80. Higher K-values indicate superior mechanical properties as well as high processing temperatures. For injection moulding operations a K-value around 57 is suitable, whereas for rigid extrusion the K-value should be around 67. K-values above 70 are better suitable for calendaring operations.
PVC hardness can be easily adjusted by the addition of a plasticizer or by blending with other polymers (see below). Consequently, PVC-based materials may range from very soft and flexible to very hard and rigid.
Plasticization of PVC
Plasticized PVC (PVC-P) will have improved flexibility as well as reduced hardness. To plasticize PVC the addition of 40% to 65% plasticizer is usually necessary. The most used plasticizer is di-(2-ethyl hexyl phthalate) (DEHP). In the past years, the utilization of phthalate-based plasticizers such as DEHP has been associated with potential carcinogenic effects. Nevertheless, the studies conducted so far have failed to substantiate the risk associated to the utilization of DEHP in medical devices.  The European view on DEHP in PVC was published by Eucomed (European medical technology industry cooperative body) via a position paper. They conclude that the many benefits of DEHP plasticized PVC in medical products offset any perceived risks [3, 4]. Current potential replacements to DEHP in this context are e.g. epoxidized soybean oil/linseed oil and Acetyl n-tributyl citrate.
Blending of PVC
A major motivation for blending PVC with other polymers is to obtain a material which shows similar properties to plasticized PVC in terms of toughness, flexibility and processability without the risk of plasticizer leaching. Furthermore, this can be achieved at a reasonable cost. Polyolefins and polystyrene are, due to their non-polarity, not miscible with PVC. Following are some possible blend combinations:

  • PVC/ABS: improved impact resistance without losing tensile strength and high heat resistance.
  • PVC/PMMA: good balance between toughness and impact resistance over a wide range of temperatures.
  • PVC/EVA: flexibility, toughness and clarity.
  • PVC/EVA-CO: clarity and permanent plasticization
  • PVC/NBR: permanent plasticization
How does PVC perform in terms of sterilization?

Generally, steam sterilization is no problem for plasticized PVC. Conversely, unplasticized PVC will start degrading. Therefore, it is better to use ethylene oxide (EtO) sterilization. EtO as well as low-temperature steam sterilization can be used for rigid and plasticized PVC. Sterilization by high-energy radiation will lead to chain scission degradation unless free radical scavengers and antioxidant stabilizers are applied [5].
What about biocompatibility?
Yes, PVC is biocompatible and hemocompatible. The latter can be further enhanced by coating devices with heparin (blood thinning medication).
Where is PVC used in medical device applications?
If we can believe most market estimates, approximately 25% of all polymer-based medical applications are made of PVC [1]. A major motivation to use PVC is that PVC is in use for 50 years without leading to any toxicological effects to the end-user. Consequently, healthcare authorities have classified PVC as safe.


For example, alongside flexibility PVC can exhibit good transparency, which is perfect for making flexible tubing such as infusers and catheters where to visually monitor contained fluids is desirable. In this context, PVC is also utilized for making containers such as flexible bags for intravenous fluids as well as storage bags for blood, plasma and urine. Furthermore, PVC is known for its toughness and strength (also at low temperatures). For this reason, PVC is used to make protective gloves which must have high resistance to tear propagation. Table 1 below shows a sum up of example applications of PVC in healthcare.
Table 1: Examples of PVC-based medical device applications.




Where to get PVC for your medical device applications?

HC grade certified thermoplastics suppliers of PVC [1]:




Thanks for reading! 
ThanThanks for reading & #findoutaboutplastics

Greetings, 
Literature: 
[1] Vinny R. Sastri: Plastics in Medical Devices, 2014
[2] EN ISO 1628-1: Fikentscher K value
[3] Joel AT, Ted S, et al. Health risks posed by use of DEHP in PVC medical devices: a critical review, Am. J. Indus. Med. 2001
[4] EUCOMED Position on the Use of Phthalate Plasticized PVC in Medical Products: www.medicalplast.com/upload/documents/document4.pdf
[5] Clough RL and Gillen KT: complex radiation degradation behavior of PVC material, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1983

















Monday, 27 February 2017

A mind sharpener guide for plastics engineers, product developers, industrial managers & business developers


This infographic presents you a quick guide to evaluate or generate successful business ideas in the new economy. The key messages are based on ideas described by Peter Thiel and Gary Vaynerchuk.
I hope you find it useful!
Till next time and #findoutaboutplastics

Herwig
[Infographic] Plastics Industry - Business Development à la 0 to 1


Sunday, 29 January 2017

European (Plastics) Industry and its struggle with Industry 4.0


Most companies created in Silicon Valley in the last 20 years offer disruptive software solutions which elevated the digital platform business models a lot. We all know Amazon, Uber, and Google, because they added value to our lives by making things easier, faster and cheaper. These use mainly network effects.

Europe was in a deep sleep regarding digitalization developments in the past 20 years. The good news is that Europe still has a chance in the second half of the digitalization game. There is a strong physical based company foundation in Europe and now it’s time to connect software solutions with physical machines by using the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). Machine-to-machine technologies and sensors are already available but its integration and operation over a cloud based IIoT is new. This will enable operational efficiency and will allow companies to re-industrialize/re-invent certain areas and, as a result, get a better perception of the customer needs. Consequently, IIoT will play a key role in the landing of (Plastics) Industry 4.0 in Europe.

Gilchrist et al. [1] concluded that to obtain significant gains, the IIoT just needs to bring 1% savings in cost/inefficiency.
Here are some examples:
  • Aviation: fuel savings of 1% per annum brings savings of $30 billion.
  • Gas-fired generators: fuel savings of 1% brings operational savings of $66 billion.
  • Oil and Gas industry: reduction of 1% in capital spending on equipment per annum would return around $90 billion.
  • Agriculture, transportation, and health care industries: here the same 1% rule holds true.
IT systems have matured over the past years and impart now confidence in senior business leaders to move toward the digital transformation.  This can already be seen in a global context where countries such as USA, China and India hold a leading position [2]. What about Europe?
In the past years, the EU has developed into a more regulated environment which is not unleashing for entrepreneurial spirits. This can be noticed in the amount of laws and other regulations which have been implemented. Thoskov [3] presented a study entitled “55 years of European Legislation”. According to the latter, since its foundation in 1957 in Rome, the EU adopted more than 100,000 legislative acts.   These days, on average, 80 directives, 1200 regulations and 700 decisions per year are approved by the EU. As a result, small and middle companies can be easily delayed and held back by the amount of regulation. This environment is neither friendly to the creation of new businesses nor to the widespread of existing ones in a digital world.
Overall, the European mindset needs a change! In my opinion, a new view on the long-lasting archaic concepts of education, work and lifestyle is needed. Following, we discuss each of these topics:
  • Education: Generally, to the majority of the EU it can be said that the education system got stuck in the late 1980’s and 1990’s. The way we teach and the content of what we teach becomes more and more outdated as digitalization progresses, i.e. a lot of content currently thought in schools can be at any time accessed through our phones.  This may mean that the nowadays children despite being digital natives and able to handle all digital technologies, will not be equipped with the necessary skills or mindset to tackle the future.
    In Education 4.0, new online education models will challenge given systems. Analytical thinking, connecting the dots of industrial issues, discussing in a cross-functional and global way needs to be stronger than ever in our toolbox. Simple things will be solved by virtual assistants, aka computers. Dueck [4] explains that you will only get well paid for things that the computer cannot do. This leads me to work 4.0.
  • Work: The 40 hour workweek is still the status quo, together with semi-home office solution. The 9-to-5 social agreement was once decided as the best solution for industry, and thus, most governments build their social systems on this basis. Despite all current working processes being more and more optimized, which means that we can do more in less time, we still fill up the bottle to 40 hours! 
    Jason Fried [5] gave a good Ted talk on the topic “Why work doesn’t happen at work”. When people start operating from everywhere at every time, the current management system creeps to its border of use. Work 4.0 says goodbye to the classic known time registration systems and really focus on delivering. Dueck [4] concluded that all administrative things will disappear. Consequently, people can really focus on the job itself and the task density will increase. As a result, people will really need to perform and the work pressure will be even higher.
    Solutions to standard businesses problems and generally business topics can be more and more found by individual Internet searches, and, thus, digital businesses will require a higher contribution of professionals with specialized knowledge. Low specialization jobs, which require short training to be up to the job task, will still exist but will be competitive and volatile. To sum up from a human resources point of view, Work 4.0 will focus rather on specialty than simplicity, e.g. cake designer or creator versus cake maker.
  • Life: Industry 4.0 or from a worldwide perspective the IIoT will enable the establishment of fully automated online businesses. This will result in additional personal time. Time   together with flexibility to travel and try out things you really want to do, but could not yet do will be the new currency.  This may also give you the opportunity to make several “mini-retirements” instead of traditionally waiting until retirement. Such concepts are presented and shaped by Tim Ferris in his book the 4-hour workweek [6].
Last but not least, we must be accepting of the increasing diversity of our societies in a globalized economy! I am optimistic about the upcoming changes and there will be up and downs which we will have to tackle through, but in the long run digitalization will increase the wealth of the worldwide societies, not only Europe! We need worldwide growth in wealth!
I invite you all for having a look at my Digital PlasticsRevolution series, which presents different “impactors” full with ideas on how to tackle successful digitalization in Plastics Industry. Impactor 1 of the series presents to you 5 ideas to get your digital plastics revolution started.
Thanks for reading!
Till next time and #findoutaboutplastics
Herwig

Literature:
[1] Alasdair Gilchrist: Industry 4.0: The Industrial Internet of Things, Apress. 2016
[6] Tim Ferris: The 4-hour work week